Case Studies

Ranpak's global reach and years of experience have led to thousands of success stories.

It is our hope that your story is next.

Our team of Packaging and Systems Engineers can take clients through design, testing, analysis and training, providing solutions and assistance from the beginning process of selecting a fully operational paper packaging system to better utilizing a system that is already in place.

Please take a moment to review the following Case Studies. If you have any additional questions, please contact us by email or by calling 1-800-RANPAK7 (1-800-726-7257).

FillPak TT vs Air Bags

Download Case StudyA leading e-commerce retailer who ships nearly 600,000 boxes per year, required a warehouse operation and a packaging system that could cope with such high volumes and fluctuations in demand. In the past, airbags were one of the only choices for operations with decentralized packing stations; this all changed with the introduction of the FillPak® TT void fill system.

FillPak vs Foam-in-place

Download Case StudyA large distributor in the publishing industry who ships an average of 8,000 packages a day, 20,000 – 25,000 during peak season, was looking for a new packaging material that would provide the best quality and value while still maintaining their current packing speed. The FillPak® was able to provide both quality, value, speed and a significant cost savings.

FillPak TT vs. Loose Fill

Download Case StudyA national leader in herbs and health supplements had been using loose fill to fill the remaining voids in their packages. Unfavorable feedback from their customers about the mess and non-recyclability of the loose fill made the manufacturer look at other packaging material alternatives. The FillPak® TT addressed customer concerns about mess and non-recyclability by providing a clean packaging material that their customers could recycle with other paper waste or reuse in other packages.

PadPak vs. Foam-in-Bag

Download Case StudyWhen foam-in-bag pads began shifting during shipment, a custom motorcycle manufacturer saw an increase in damage returns. In need of a new product to protect their expensive parts, they turned to PadPak® which was able to provide not only better protection with zero damage returns, but also a cost savings.

PadPak vs. Loose Fill – Custom Engineering

Download Case StudyAn industrial supply product distributor based in Indiana began having customers refuse packages that were packed in packaging peanuts and started searching for an alternative packaging material that would not increase their material costs. This search led them to the PadPak® cushioning system. Ranpak engineers were able to successfully integrate the PadPak system into their limited packing area without any major layout changes.